Foreword
The mission of
the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is
to assess the quantity and quality of the earth resources of the Nation
and to provide information that will assist resource managers and policymakers
at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound decisions. Assessment
of water-quality conditions and trends is an important part of this overall
mission.
One of the greatest
challenges faced by water-resources scientists is acquiring reliable information
that will guide the use and protection of the Nation's water resources.
That challenge is being addressed by Federal, State, interstate, and local
water-resource agencies and by many academic institutions. These organizations
are collecting water-quality data for a host of purposes that include:
compliance with permits and water-supply standards; development of remediation
plans for a specific contamination problem; operational decisions on industrial,
wastewater, or water-supply facilities; and research on factors that affect
water quality. An additional need for water-quality information is to
provide a basis on which regional and national-level policy decisions
can be based. Wise decisions must be based on sound information. As a
society we need to know whether certain types of water-quality problems
are isolated or ubiquitous, whether there are significant differences
in conditions among regions, whether the conditions are changing over
time, and why these conditions change from place to place and over time.
The information can be used to help determine the efficacy of existing
water-quality policies and to help analysts determine the need for and
likely consequences of new policies.
To address these
needs, the Congress appropriated funds in 1986 for the USGS to begin a
pilot program in seven project areas to develop and refine the National
Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. In 1991, the USGS began
full implementation of the program. The NAWQA Program builds upon an existing
base of water-quality studies of the USGS, as well as those of other Federal,
State, and local agencies. (See
Map-21K)
The objectives of the NAWQA Program are to:
- Describe current water-quality
conditions for a large part of the Nation's freshwater streams, rivers,
and aquifers.
- Describe how water quality
is changing over time.
- Improve understanding of
the primary natural and human factors that affect water-quality conditions.
This information
will help support the development and evaluation of management, regulatory,
and monitoring decisions by other Federal, State, and local agencies to
protect, use, and enhance water resources.
The goals of the
NAWQA Program are being achieved through ongoing and proposed investigations
of 60 of the Nation's most important river basins and aquifer systems,
which are referred to as study units. These study units are distributed
throughout the Nation and cover a diversity of hydrogeologic settings.
More than two-thirds of the Nation's freshwater use occurs within the
60 study units and more than two-thirds of the people served by public
water-supply systems live within their boundaries.
National
synthesis of data analysis, based on aggregation of comparable information
obtained from the study units, is a major component of the program. This
effort focuses on selected water-quality topics using nationally consistent
information. Comparative studies will explain differences and similarities
in observed water-quality conditions among study areas and will identify
changes and trends and their causes. The first topics addressed by the
national synthesis are pesticides, nutrients, volatile organic compounds,
and aquatic biology. Discussions on these and other water-quality topics
will be published in periodic summaries of the quality of the Nation's
ground and surface water as the information becomes available.
This world-wide-web
site is an element of the comprehensive body of information developed
as part of the NAWQA Program. The program depends heavily on the advice,
cooperation, and information from many Federal, State, interstate, Tribal,
and local agencies and the public. The assistance and suggestions of all
are greatly appreciated.
Robert M. Hirsch
Chief Hydrologist
|