ABSTRACT
Field tests were performed
on two types of diffusion samplers to collect representative samples of
inorganic constituents from ground water in wells and at an
arsenic-contaminated ground-water-discharge zone beneath a stream. Nylon-screen
samplers and dialysis samplers were tested for the collection of arsenic, calcium,
chloride, iron, manganese, sulfate, and dissolved oxygen. The investigations
were conducted at the Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant (NIROP), Fridley,
Minnesota, and at the Naval Air Station Fort Worth Joint Reserve Base (NAS Fort
Worth JRB), Texas.
Data indicate that,
in general, nylon-screen and dialysis diffusion samplers are capable of
obtaining concentrations of inorganic solutes in ground water that correspond
to concentrations obtained by low-flow sampling. Diffusion samplers offer a
potentially time-saving approach to well sampling. Particular care must be
taken, however, when sampling for iron and other metals, because of the
potential for iron precipitation by oxygenation and when dealing with
chemically stratified sampling intervals. Simple nylon-screen jar samplers
buried beneath creekbed sediment appear to be effective tools for locating
discharge zones of arsenic contaminated ground water.
Although
the LDPE samplers have proven to be inexpensive and simple to use in wells,
they are limited by their inability to provide a representative sample of ionic
solutes. The success of nylon-screen samplers in sediment studies suggests that
these simple samplers may be useful for collecting water samples for inorganic constituents
in wells. Results using dialysis bags deployed in wells suggest that these
types of samplers have the potential to provide a representative sample of both
VOCs and ionic solutes from ground water (Kaplan and others, 1991; Theodore A.
Ehlke, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 2001).
The
purpose of this report is to provide results of field tests investigating the
potential to use diffusion samplers to collect representative samples of
inorganic constituents from ground water in wells and at an
arsenic-contaminated ground-water-discharge zone beneath a stream. The
investigations were performed at NIROP, Fridley, Minn. (fig. 1) and at NAS Fort
Worth JRB, Texas (fig. 2). Two types of samplers were tested. One type was a nylon-screen
sampler, which consisted of a 30-mL jar filled with deionized water, with its
opening covered by a nylon screen. The second type was a dialysis sampler that
consisted of a tube of dialysis membrane filled with deionized water. The
nylon-screen samplers were deployed in wells at NIROP Fridley and NAS Fort
Worth JRB and beneath the ground-water/surface water interface of a stream at
NAS Fort Worth JRB. The dialysis samplers were deployed only in wells at NAS
Fort Worth JRB.


By Don A. Vroblesky, Matthew D. Petkewich, and Ted R. Campbell