USGS

Water Resources of South Carolina Publication
blue line.

REAL-TIME CONTROL OF THE SALT FRONT IN A COMPLEX,
TIDALLY AFFECTED RIVER BASIN

By Edwin A. Roehl, OptiQuest Technologies, Greenville, SC
and Paul A. Conrads, U.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, SC


Conference Paper
Proceedings from the ASME Conference, ANNIE 2000
Artificial Neural Network in Engineering
American Society of Mechanical Engineers


Download FULL TEXT 8p.(297kb pdf)

To view or print FULL TEXT Report - Get free Adobe Acrobat Reader Software

Abstract

      The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) participated in comparing artificial neu ral networks (ANN's) to deterministic models of transport and water quality phenomena of an estuary in Charleston, SC. The models were developed from real-time data from a gauging network operated by the USGS. The results favore d the ANN's accuracy and reduced development time. They could spatially interpolate between gauging stations to pr edict the location of the freshwater/saltwater interface, called the "salt front." The salt front location depends on the interaction of freshwater flowing downstream from a hydroelectric dam and tidal forcing of saltwater upstr eam. Government regulations conservatively control dam releases to prevent saltwater migrating into a freshwater r eservoir, but sub-optimizes the commercial operation of the dam. This paper describes an alternative control appro ach using an ANN model of the "gain" between the freshwater releases and the specific conductivity, used to estima te salinity, near the reservoir. A scheme for implementing the model in a real-time control system is also describ ed.


CONTENTS
Abstract
Introduction
Data Preparation
Modeling the Gain
Prediction and Control
Discussion and Conclusions
References

FIGURES
Figure 1. The Cooper and Wando River, SC.
Figure 2. ANN model's spatially interpolated SC and WL for one tidal cycle six hours apart.
Figure 3. Detail of actual SC at s53 and s50 (30 and 45 km upstream of s710 respectively)
Figure 4. Detail of actual and filtered WL at s011 and s710.
Figure 5. Detail of actual and predicted filtered WL at s011.
Figure 6. Detail of actual and predicted filtered SC at s50.
Figure 7. Predicted SC at s50 on dam releases during low and high tidal levels.
Figure 8. Actual and predicted filtered SC at s50.
Figure 9. Idealized controller uses an ANN-based process model with an optimization


For comments or questions, Pubs Information
Maintainer: SC WebTeam
Last modification: 31-Mar-2004@16:19